I want to talk about the other half of the equation: the man on the other end of the bite. Not a guaranteed response. Not a chart that tells us what he must do next. My position is simple: a protection standard should not depend on another person behaving the way we expect. It should not depend on a handler pretending to know what is happening inside that person’s head, either.
I want preparation that respects uncertainty. That includes being honest about what stress research can and cannot tell us. A threatening or painful encounter can activate sympathetic stress pathways, including the release of adrenaline and noradrenaline, with effects on cardiovascular activity and other bodily processes; the response varies with the person and situation (Ghasemi, Beversdorf, and Herman, 2024). That gives us a reason to take stress seriously. It does not give us a script for every human being.
THE ARTICLE CONTINUES
Want to keep reading? Become a subscriber.
Read the full article and download its PDF. Your core membership also includes eligible KINETIC™ video education.
Introductory offer: $129.99 per month for your first 12 monthly payments, then $159.99 per month. Introductory enrollment ends November 15, 2026. Full pricing & terms
Full-text downloads are not available on this page.
THE READING RECORD
Sources & Editorial Notes
Explore the references behind the discussion. Source-specific context and limitations are available with each entry.
Ghasemi, Beversdorf and Herman (2024) provide a narrative review of human stress physiology and interventions. The review does not establish a universal response to an encounter or a diagnostic rule for dogs.
Publication identity and cited scope checked October 19, 2026. Read the original methods and limitations. No endorsement of K1K9 is implied.
Shields, Sazma and Yonelinas (2016) report a meta-analysis of acute stress and human executive functions. Working memory and cognitive flexibility were impaired on average; effects on inhibition were more nuanced. These are human findings, not canine diagnostic criteria.
Publication identity and cited scope checked October 19, 2026. Read the original methods and limitations. No endorsement of K1K9 is implied.
Andersen and Gustafsberg (2016) randomized 12 experienced Finnish police officers, six per group. Results from the simulated scenarios support further study of stress preparation; the small sample does not establish universal outcomes or validate K1K9 training.
Publication identity and cited scope checked October 19, 2026. Read the original methods and limitations. No endorsement of K1K9 is implied.
Baldwin and colleagues published this study in January 2022, despite the 2021 volume/DOI. It examined 122 officers from one Canadian agency in one simulated lethal-force scenario. Associations between stress, training and performance are not a universal physiological threshold or a canine finding.
Publication identity and cited scope checked October 19, 2026. Read the original methods and limitations. No endorsement of K1K9 is implied.
Marlatte, Di Nota and Andersen (2025) studied 57 officers in two simulated encounters. The study measured heart rate, not heart-rate variability. Relationships with decision errors were exploratory and context-dependent; it does not support “higher heart rate always means worse performance.”
Publication identity and cited scope checked October 19, 2026. Read the original methods and limitations. No endorsement of K1K9 is implied.
Artwohl (2002) reports a written survey of 157 officers involved in shootings. These are retrospective human accounts of perception and memory, not canine observations or proof of an inevitable stress response.
Publication identity and cited scope checked October 19, 2026. Read the original methods and limitations. No endorsement of K1K9 is implied.
Anderson, Di Nota, Metz and Andersen (2019), The Impact of Acute Stress Physiology on Skilled Motor Performance: Implications for Policing. This review concerns stress physiology and skilled human performance, not dog behavior or K1K9 product validation.
Publication identity and cited scope checked October 19, 2026. Read the original methods and limitations. No endorsement of K1K9 is implied.
Educational reading, not individual legal, veterinary or operational advice. References provide context; they do not imply endorsement of K1K9 or its methods.
